A letter addressed to Amanda Nevill and Anthony Minghella by 48 leading academics from around the world is published in this week’s Times Higher Education Supplement. The letter was sent before the BFI circulated its plans, but the concerns expressed in it were on the mark.
BFI’s vital mission
We have read the document The BFI: A Preview on the institute’s web page, which details initial plans for a radical overhaul. We applaud the desire to examine how to maintain and develop the BFI’s historic mission but are concerned that the document does not address book publishing.
Publishing at the BFI has long been a key component of its national and international image and reputation.
We and many other senior scholars of the media around the world have benefited from the wealth of sophisticated, high-level cultural research and pedagogy that the area has supported and promoted.
As an imprint and a group of in-house intellectuals linked to the wider tasks of the institute (many of whom have been distinguished authors in their own right), BFI Publishing has made a unique contribution to the study of film and television around the globe.
We are not aware of any specific plans the BFI has to evaluate publishing, but with so many segments of public culture at risk through the desire to monetise all and sundry, we want to emphasise the importance of this wing of your activities.
For us, for media studies academics and students around the world, it could not be greater. Publishing at the BFI is an international flagship to millions of people in education.
We urge you to sustain and develop this vital independent voice.
University of California, Riverside
And 45 other leading academics from around the world
Anyone interested in the future of the BFI and especially the BFI library should have a look at this website and consider signing up in support of the group:
[Custodes Lucis website has closed down]