Issue 4 of the BFI’s New Era for Film transition newsletter circulated today details the new work activity, the new departments and their location. To access PDF click below.
The second issue of the BFI/UKFC transfer newsletter was circulated to staff yesterday. To access PDF, click below.
From 4rfv.co.uk today:
|UK Film Transfers In April: Vaizey|
|Specific dates for the British Film Institute and UK Film Council’s transfer dates have been announced.
From 1 April, the British Film Institute (BFI) will be appointed Lottery distributor for film, creative industries, the Culture Minister Ed Vaizey announced.
Speaking at the recent British Screen Advisory Council Annual Film Conference, Mr Vaizey praised the work of the BFI, the UK Film Council and Film London for their work to ensure the transfer can take place the first day of the new financial year.
Based on current expectations, following the transfer the UK Film Council will close on 1 July.
Certification will also transfer to the BFI on 1 April, whilst the office of the British Commissioner will transfer to Film London.
Mr Vaizey said the Government is “absolutely committed” to continue supporting the British film industry, including through increasing the share of Lottery proceeds in film to 60% from £27M a year currently, to around £43m by 2014.
Mr Vaizey also spoke about the forthcoming film policy review, which will look at improving the sustainability of the industry.
“We need to continue to engage with the industry on how the Lottery distribution and recoupment policy can better contribute to support the indigenous industry.
“I want to work closely with the industry on this, which is why I’ve established a Ministerial forum to stimulate dialogue and consider key concerns,” he said.
During the speech Mr Vaizey also praised the many nominations for British films at the BAFTAs, Golden Globes and Oscars this year and highlighted innovative collaborations between film and other sectors, including cinemas opening their screens to live content such as opera.
The BFI has set up a newsletter on its website for the transition of UKFC responsibilities to the institute.
From the Independent today:
Protest over BFI library move
By Rob Sharp, Arts Correspondent
Wednesday, 19 January 2011
Britain’s top film academics are protesting against plans to move one of Britain’s best film book libraries to a new location in a bid to save costs.
The British Film Institute (BFI) is mooting proposals to split the contents of its current library, at its base just off London’s Tottenham Court Road, between its National Archive Facility in Berkhamstead, Hertfordshire and its premises on London’s South Bank. The move is part of a drive to cut costs by 15 per cent over the next year.
In a letter to the BFI seen by The Independent, 25 film studies professors, including the University of Southampton’s Professor Pam Cook, whose cinema books are required reading for film students nationwide, have damned the move.
“It’s as if the British Library were to move to Hertfordshire,” reads the letter. “The BFI National Library has underpinned the growth of UK film and moving image scholarship, which has in turn supported the UK’s thriving cultural and creative industries. We are not aware of any consultation with library users, who, incidentally, pay an annual fee for the service, still less with donors to the collection – some of whom made gifts because the BFI offered central London access.”
The BFI claims the move will increase public access to its collections and make delivery of its library services more efficient.
“It is imperative the BFI builds on its successes and remains commercially astute in this tough new environment,” said BFI director Amanda Nevill upon announcing the proposals late last year. “We have an incredible opportunity in the months and years ahead to create something very special for film in the UK and these proposals are both bold and necessary”.
The BFI will also need to lose 37 staff in the cost-saving measures, which will see a portion of the BFI’s books digitised. The institution is discussing its plans with a design consultant to see if a greater number of books can go on display at the South Bank location.
“Another solution must be found if the BFI insists on curtailing access to one of the UK’s key intellectual resources,” continued the letter. “A merger with the British Library seems the most promising solution. And the BFI must talk to users who are most directly affected by this disastrous decision and who, like us, can see the long-term and wide-ranging damage done by such a decision.”