|
||||||||||||||||||||
Iron lady leads BFI membership campaign
In light of Margaret Thatcher’s well-known antipathy to culture and lack of interest in cinema, it’s curious that the Iron Lady figures prominently in the BFI’s membership campaign. One wonders which demographic is being targeted here …
New BFI member governor
This item appeared in the Guardian Diary yesterday:
Diary
A controversial election. Members disgruntled. Plenty of plot-lines at the BFI
guardian.co.uk, Wednesday 15 February 2012 22.50 GMT
• Exciting times at the British Film Institute. Today the BFI unveiled a new addition to the board of governors, the acclaimed film-maker Peter Kosminsky. He’s a top man. So that’s all fine and dandy. Except it may not be. For the election for a new person to help represent the membership was run under rules themselves controversial. They said that those contesting the election had to come from outside London, the better to represent the regions, and that the winner should obtain 10% of the vote. This miffed quite a few in London who might like to have stood, and they are even more scratchy now because Kosminsky, though victorious, only gained 9.25% of the vote. High ups on the board, led by chairman Greg Dyke, have been trying to work it all out since the polls closed in December. Kosminsky’s the man, is the approach. Seems that in the event of no candidate reaching the 10% threshold, the board is empowered to make a decision, and there was no mention of his electoral deficiency in today’s press release. But there is grumbling. It’s all a bit tinker tailor don’t you think?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2012/feb/15/hugh-muirs-diary-john-prescott?newsfeed=true
Reaction to A Future for British Film proposals
From 4rfv.co.uk today:
| 19 January 2012 |
| Call Made For Action On UK Film Policy |
| A report on ‘The Future of British Film’ has inspired warnings that a “huge job” is at hand to deliver the proposals and call for proof that it can be put into action.
According to an article by Screen Dailythe British Film Institute has been warned to be careful about the amount of proposals that it takes on. Peter Watson, CEO of production outfit Recorded Picture Company and deputy chairman of sister sales company HanWay told Screen Dailythat: “the BFI should resist taking on all the responsibilities the report would seek to pile on its shoulders. The BFI will need to carefully define its new role and not forget its pre-eminent role as a cultural organisation and trustee of our national heritage. Rightly, the industry has high hopes for the new BFI but our expectations should be qualified.” Indeed although received positively by most writers, producers, distributors, financiers and academics the report does outline a massive 56 proposals and now all eyes are on BFI to implement them. Hopes are that the film institution will adopt most of them, if not all of them, and move quickly. A call is on for the BFI to move the plans from words to action. (LB/DW) |
A Future for British Film
The independent panel’s report to the government on the film policy review survey has been published:
